Sunday, June 25, 2017

The latest revelations from Diana's tapes

'We were so close, then Harry was born... Bang! Our marriage was down the drain': Ignored by her husband, terrified of her public role and devastated that Charles was back with Camilla. The latest revelations from Diana's tapes

The arrival of Prince William in 1982 and, just over two years later, Prince Harry, signalled to the world that the fairy-tale union of Charles and Diana was complete. 
It would be several more years before she took the extraordinary step of revealing to royal author Andrew Morton, in tape recordings she insisted be kept secret, that their marriage had collapsed. 
The book he wrote — Diana, Her True Story — made headlines around the world. Now, 20 years after her death, it is being republished — with the transcripts of those tapes.
Today’s extract focuses on the early years of her marriage. Diana, struggling with bulimia, depression and her conviction that Charles still loved Camilla, was terrified of letting the royal side down. 
 **************************************************
When I first arrived on the (royal) scene, I’d always put my head down. Now that I interpret it, that did look sulky.
I’ve never sulked. I never sulked as a child; it’s just not in me.
But I’ve been terrified out of my tiny little mind. I was just so frightened of the attention I was getting. It took me six years to get comfortable.
One minute, I was nobody; the next minute, I was Princess of Wales — mother, media toy, member of this family, you name it. And it was too much for one person at that time.
Basically, my husband’s office got in a turmoil because one minute, there was one (royal to look after), and the next minute, there were two.


When they were still in love: A public kiss for Charles and wife Diana. The arrival of Prince William in 1982 and, just over two years later, Prince Harry, signalled to the world that the fairy-tale union of Charles and Diana was complete



And the presents coming in from the wedding were so phenomenal — from a swimming pool, to a desk set, to a photograph frame to six dining-room chairs. Chaos! I ended up writing my own thank-you letters.
Eventually, we sorted out something and I had Oliver Everett (former assistant private secretary to Prince Charles) come back to help me. I drove him quite potty because he pushed me into a corner that didn’t suit. There were basically lots of tears. From me! Edward Adeane (Prince Charles’s private secretary from 1979-85) was wonderful — we got on so well. He was very much the bachelor — and I was always trying to find him the ideal woman, but I didn’t succeed at all. He was sweet.
He said: ‘I know some nice ladies who might be ladies-in-waiting. Will you come and see them and meet them?’
So I said ‘yes’ to them all, even though I didn’t really know them, and one or two have gone by the wayside, but the others have remained very strong — and I’ve gathered a few on the way as well.
Stuck-up Liz Taylor didn't help at all
What I can remember is that I didn’t want to do anything on my own. I was too frightened.
The thought of me doing anything on my own sent tremors, so I stuck with whatever Charles did. If that included a wife, I went with him all the way — wherever.
But the pace was phenomenal. I knew I couldn’t do engagements as well as get married, plus doing up two houses.
One of the very first royal engagements was with Elizabeth Taylor. It was a play at the Victoria [Palace] Theatre called The Little Foxes. I remember I turned up in a fake white fur coat, and all the antis came out against me for evermore. So that went back into the cupboard, never to be seen again.
I was pregnant with William and it was agonising because I didn’t find Elizabeth Taylor very easy to talk to. I thought she was stuck-up. I’d hoped she’d help me out because she’d been on the stage, in inverted commas, more than I had. I remember getting through that evening feeling amazed.
(Another engagement was switching on the Regent Street Christmas lights.)
I remember wearing a pair of navy blue culottes with a pink shirt, and I felt so sick. I couldn’t do them up because I was pregnant, but I didn’t have anything else to wear.
And I was so nervous. I had to make a speech in front of the whole of Regent Street. I was s*** scared.
Christmas at Sandringham was highly fraught. Terrifying and so disappointing. No boisterous behaviour, lots of tension, silly behaviour, silly jokes that outsiders would find odd, but insiders understood. I sure was an outsider.
I hadn’t got enough background on what the Princess of Wales was supposed to do. It didn’t get easier — I just got used to what people required from the Princess of Wales.
What Diana thought wasn’t going to come into it — yet.
Princess Grace was an outsider — like me
When Grace (Princess of Monaco) died (in 1982), I said to Charles: ‘I feel I’d very much like to represent your mama at the funeral,’ and he said: ‘Well, we’ll have to ask her, but I doubt she’ll let you go.’
And I said: ‘Well, I think it’s important, because she was an outsider who married into a big family and I’ve done the same, so it would feel right.’


When Grace (Princess of Monaco) died (in 1982), I said to Charles: ‘I feel I’d very much like to represent your mama at the funeral,’ and he said: ‘Well, we’ll have to ask her, but I doubt she’ll let you go.’



I went to (the Queen’s private secretary) Philip Moore, who said he didn’t think it would be possible because I’d only been in the job three or four months. And I said I could do it perfectly standing on my head.
There was no worry about that. I knew exactly how to behave etcetera, etcetera, and I wanted to be a part of Grace’s funeral because I admired her so much; she was so sweet to me.
So I went to the Queen and I said: ‘You know, I’d like to do this,’ and she said: ‘I don’t see why not. If you want to do this, you can.’ And I said: ‘That would be marvellous, thank you.’ I went there, did my bit, came back and everyone was all over me like a bad rash: ‘Oh, you did so well!’
And I thought: ‘Well, interesting.’
Make-or-break time on the Australia tour
The first foreign trip we took William on was Australia and New Zealand (in March 1983, with the nine-month-old Prince the first royal baby to go on an official overseas visit). Make-or-break time for me. This was the real hard crunch, the hard end of being the Princess of Wales.
There were thousands of press following us. We were away six weeks, and the first day we went to this school in Alice Springs. It was hot, I was jet-lagged, being sick. I was too thin. The whole world was focusing on me every day. I was on the front of the papers. I thought that this was just so appalling — I hadn’t done something specific, like climb Everest or something wonderful like that.
However, I came back from one engagement and I went to my lady-in-waiting, cried my eyes out and said: ‘Anne (Beckwith-Smith), I’ve got to go home — I can’t cope with this.’
She was devastated, too, because it was her first job.
So that first week was such a traumatic week for me; I learned to be royal, in inverted commas, in one week. I was thrown into the deep end — though now I prefer it that way.
Nobody ever helped me at all. They’d be there to criticise me, but never there to say: ‘Well done.’
Basically, our tour was a great success. Everybody always said, when we were in the car: ‘Oh, we’re in the wrong side, we want to see her — we don’t want to see him.’
That’s all we could hear when we went down these crowds — and obviously he wasn’t used to that, and nor was I.
He took it out on me. He was jealous; I understood the jealousy but I couldn’t explain that I didn’t ask for it.
I kept saying you’ve married someone, and whoever you’d have married would have been of interest for the clothes, how she handles this, that and the other. And you build the building block for your wife to stand on.
He didn’t see that at all. (In public, Charles accepted the new status quo with good grace; in private, he blamed Diana.)


Surf’s up: Sydney turns out for Diana on the Royal Tour Down Under in 1983


It was very tricky, mentally, for me, because the crowds were just something to be believed. My husband had never seen crowds like it, and I sure as hell hadn’t.
Everyone kept saying it will all quieten down when you’ve had your first baby, but it never quietened down. Never.
We never had a fight (about taking Prince William on tour). The person who never got any credit was Malcolm Fraser, who was then Prime Minister. He wrote to us out of the blue.
I was all ready to leave William. I accepted that as part of duty, albeit it wasn’t going to be easy.
He wrote to me and said: ‘Would you like to bring your child out?’
And Charles said: ‘What do you think about this?’
I said: ‘Oh, it would be absolutely wonderful.’
He said: ‘Then we can do six weeks instead of four, and we can cover New Zealand as well, so it would be perfect.’
I said: ‘Wonderful.’
It was always reputed that I had had an argument with the Queen about it. We never even asked her — we just did it.
It was very nice. We didn’t see very much of William (who was based with his nanny at Woomargama, a 4,000-acre sheep station in New South Wales), but at least we were under the same sky, so to speak.
That was a great fulfilment for me, because everyone wanted to know about his progress.
When we came back from our six-week tour, I was a different person. I was more grown up, more mature — but that was nothing like the process I was going to go through in the next four or five years.
Charles desperately wanted a baby girl
Between William and Harry being born, it is total darkness. I can’t remember much. I’ve blotted it out. It was such pain.
However, Harry appeared (on September 15, 1984) by a miracle. Charles and I were very, very close to each other the six weeks before Harry was born, the closest we’ve ever, ever been and ever will be.
Then, suddenly, as Harry was born, it just went bang, our marriage: the whole thing went down the drain.
I knew Harry was going to be a boy because I saw on the scan. Charles always wanted a girl. He wanted two children and he wanted a girl. I knew Harry was a boy and I didn’t tell him.
Harry arrived, Harry had red hair, Harry was a boy. First comment was: ‘Oh God, it’s a boy.’ Second comment: ‘And he’s even got red hair.’
Something inside me closed off. By then, I knew Charles had gone back to his lady, but somehow we’d managed to have Harry.
Charles went to talk to my mother at Harry’s christening and said: ‘We were so disappointed — we thought it would be a girl.’
Mummy snapped his head off, saying: ‘You should realise how lucky you are to have a child that’s normal.’
Ever since that day, the shutters have come down — and that’s what he does when he gets somebody answering back at him.
Harry was a complete joy and is actually closer to his father than perhaps William at the moment. Charles loved the nursery life and couldn’t wait to get back and do the bottle and everything. He was very good — he always came back and fed the baby. I breastfed William for three weeks and Harry for 11 weeks.
I chose the names William and Harry because the alternative was Arthur and Albert. No, thank you. There weren’t fights over it. It was just a fait accompli.
The Pope thought I was having a baby!
With President and Mrs Göncz of Hungary (on our trip in 1990), I had an instant rapport. I got out of the aeroplane and we held hands.
Extraordinary — it felt so normal, me doing it. It was on the front of all the papers at home. I remember thinking: ‘What’s so odd about that?’
I also had an audience with the Pope (John Paul II in 1985) — I thought that was rather wonderful, very special. I was totally overwhelmed.
I was so intimidated by the set-up. When you’re sat there with this man in a white frock, it was quite strange.
He had recently been shot (and severely wounded by a Turkish gunman). I said one thing to him. I plucked up courage and said: ‘How are your wounds?’
He thought I was talking about my womb! So he thought I was having a baby! So after that mistake, I went very quietly.
On our trip to Spain (April 1987), I wasn’t well at all — tiredness, exhaustion, bone-tired. I told everybody I was tired, but it was the bulimia taking a grip of me.
Portugal was the last time we were close as man and wife. That’s going back six or seven years ago now (February 1987). Charles’s snoring could be heard through two doors. Four times a night I’d be woken up. He just got fed up and went into his dressing room. And then it became a habit.
Then there was Majorca (on holiday with the King and Queen of Spain in 1986), the first trip I spent my whole time with my head down the loo.
I hated it so much because they were all so busy thinking Charles was the most wonderful creature there’s ever been — and who was this girl coming along?
And I knew there was (a quality) inside me that wasn’t coming out, and I didn’t know how to use it — in the sense of letting them see it. I didn’t feel at all comfortable in that situation.
My first policeman, and he was sweet
Graham Smith was my first policeman; he came from Princess Anne. He’d been with her a few years.
I remember asking him as a first question: ‘Do you like horses?’ He said: ‘No.’ I said: ‘Good,’ because at the time I wasn’t interested in horses.
He was sweet, but it took a long time to get used to having a policeman.
God, suddenly to have this man in your car — music had to be turned down, I had to make sure he was fed, all those things. But I was brought up to look after others.
Watching soaps meant I could talk to anyone
I always used to think people just looked at my clothes, and I was desperate for my other side to come out but I didn’t know how to do it.
I hope they know that I love children and little people, but I suppose it comes across. I’m just demented about my own children and it’s mutual.
There’s terrific understanding (between me and members of the public). Top Of The Pops, Coronation Street, all the soap operas. You name it, I’ve watched it.
The reason why I watch them so much now is not so much out of interest, but if I go out and about, whether it be to Birmingham, Liverpool or Dorset, I can always pick up on a TV programme and you are on the same level.
That, I decided for myself. It works so well. Everybody watches it and I say: ‘Did you see so and so? Wasn’t it funny when this happened or that happened?’
Charles was thrilled with his silk pyjamas
On the day I got engaged, I literally had one long dress, one silk shirt, one smart pair of shoes and that was it. Suddenly, my mother and I had to go and buy six of everything.
We bought as much as we thought we needed, but we still didn’t have enough.
Bear in mind you have to change four times a day, and suddenly your wardrobe expands to something unbelievable.
Hence, probably, the criticism when I first arrived on the scene of having new clothes all the time. Three seasons and I had to deck myself out from January to December overnight with hats, gloves, the lot.
After that, I asked Anna Harvey from Vogue, where both my sisters had worked, to come and help me out with the basic things.
But once I got to know established names, like Victor Edelstein and Catherine Walker, I could ring them up and talk to them myself.
I couldn’t have fashionable clothes because it wouldn’t have been practical for the job. I had to have clothes that could last all day long, in sensible colours and sensible necklines and skirt lengths.
I never knew a thing about having weights in hems (to prevent skirts from blowing up in the wind). I found it all out in my own time. No one helped with that.
Charles had an awful lot of clothes, but actually very little (that I liked).
For instance, he had ghastly Aertex pyjamas that were honestly, simply hideous, so I bought him a silk pair, that sort of thing — and shoes.
They were well received. He was absolutely thrilled.
I burst into tears — and he ignored me
The press attention was like Marilyn Monroe publicity. She only had to click her heels and the whole world was at her feet. It was very odd.
I’m never comfortable in it. Never ever. I was absolutely mesmerised by the whole thing. I couldn’t believe it.
(The Royal Family) all thought: ‘Oh, she’s got lots of press — she must be doing all right.’
One of the worst things that ever happened was when we went to Wales after the flooding (in 1987).
There’d been a tremendous amount of press about Charles and I being apart, and we got into the jet and I burst into tears.
He said: ‘Oh God, what’s the matter?’
And I said: ‘I’ve had a very bad time with the press.’ Because they’d literally hunted me.
And he said: ‘Well, if you were in the right place, none of this would happen,’ indicating that I should be up in Scotland. But I said: ‘I choose to work, because that’s my role in life.’
And it was terrible — he completely ignored me.
It was a real cry for help. I wasn’t blubbing because I’d just turned the taps on. It was just desperation. And it showed in all the photographs.

આ જગતને કોણ નિયંત્રિત કરી રહ્યું છે, અને તેનો સૃષ્ટા કોણ છે? - મહેન્દ્ર પુનાતર


જિનદર્શન - મહેન્દ્ર પુનાતર


આ સમગ્ર જગત કેમ ચાલે છે? તેની પાછળનું બળ ક્યું છે? કોણ તેને નિયંત્રિત કરી રહ્યું છે? આ વિશ્ર્વ, આ બ્રહ્માંડ શું છે? આ ગહન પ્રશ્ર્નોની મનુષ્યની ખોજ સદાકાળથી ચાલી આવી છે. આમ છતાં સૃષ્ટિના રહસ્યોને મનુષ્ય ખરા અર્થમાં સમજી શક્યો નથી. જૈન દર્શને આ અંગેનો વિસ્તૃત ખ્યાલ આપ્યો છે. આ જગત છ મૂળ દ્રવ્યો પર રચાયેલું છે. ધર્મ, અધર્મ, આકાશ, કાળ, પુદગલ અને જીવ એ છ દ્રવ્યો છે. કે વળી ભગવંતોએ હવે આ બધાને ‘લોક’ નામ આપ્યું છે.

જગતમાં જે મૂળ દ્રવ્યો છે એ સદાકાળથી છે તેને કોઇએ બનાવ્યા નથી અને તેને કોઇ મિટાવી શકશે નહીં. આ દ્રવ્યો રૂપાંતરિત થાય છે.

એ બને છે, બગડે છે. પરંતુ બનવું બગડવું તેના રૂપનું છે. મૂળ તત્ત્વ બનતુ પણ નથી અને બગડતું પણ નથી. આ છ દ્રવ્યો સદાકાળથી છે અને સદાકાળ રહેશે. અને બીજું વચમાં જે કાંઇ દેખાય છે તે આ છ મૂળ દ્રવ્યોનું પરસ્પર એક થવું અથવા જુદા થવું એ છે. સમગ્ર સંસાર સંયોગ છે અને આ છ દ્રવ્યો મૂળ છે. અનંત આત્માઓ છે અને આત્મા પરમાત્મા બનવાની ક્ષમતા ધરાવે છે. આત્માની ત્રણ અવસ્થા છે.

એક બહિર આત્મા જ્યારે ચેતના બહાર તરફ વહે છે. બીજી અવસ્થા છે અંતરાત્મા જ્યારે ચેતના ભીતરની તરફ વહે છે. વાસના અને વિચારો બહારની તરફ વહે છે. જ્યારે આત્માની નિમ્રતમ અવસ્થા ધ્યાનમાં અને મૌનમાં છે જે અંદરની તરફ વહે છે. આત્માની ત્રીજી અવસ્થા છે જેમાં ચેતના ક્યાંય પણ વહેતી નથી. ન તો બહાર કે ન તો અંદર. ચેતના હોય છે પરંતુ ગતિ કે કંપન રહેતું નથી. આ સમાધિ અવસ્થા છે. સ્થિરતામાં સંપૂર્ણ જાગૃતિ. આ ત્રીજી અવસ્થામાં આત્મા પરમાત્મા બની શકે છે. બહિર આત્મામાંથી અંતરાત્મા અને અંતરાત્મામાંથી પરમાત્મા બનવાનું હોય છે. અનંત આત્માઓ છે. કોઇ એક આત્મા બીજામાં લીન થઇ શકતો નથી. દરેકનું સ્વતંત્ર દ્રવ્ય અસ્તિત્વ છે.

ધર્મ દ્રવ્યનું લક્ષણ છે ગતિ. જેમાં ગતિ હોય છે તે ધર્મ. જેમાં ગતિ અટકે છે તે અધર્મ. જેમાં વિકાસ થાય છે તે ધર્મ અને જેનાથી અભિવ્યક્તિ પૂર્ણ કક્ષાએ પહોંચે છે તે ધર્મ. જેનાથી વિકાસ અને પ્રગતિ અટકી જાય છે તે અધર્મ. અધર્મ સ્થિતિને રોકી દે છે.

જ્યારે ધર્મ ગતિના તત્ત્વને આગળ વધારે છે. બંને વસ્તુઓ આપણા પર આધાર રાખે છે. આપણે અધર્મ સાથે જોડાઇ જઇએ તો ગતિ અટકે છે. ધર્મની સાથે જોડાઇએ તો આગળ વધવાનું શરૂ થાય છે. આ આધ્યાત્મિક યાત્રા છે. માછલીમાં તરવાની ક્ષમતા હોય છે પરંતુ પાણીનો સહારો ન હોય તો તે તરી શકતી નથી. આપણી ક્ષમતા છે પરમાત્મા બનવાની પરંતુ ધર્મનો સહારો હશે તો આપણે તરી શકીશું અને અધર્મનો સહારો હશે તો ડૂબતા પણ વાર નહીં લાગે. જીવનની અમૃતયાત્રામાં જ્યાં જ્યાં રોકવાવાળા તત્ત્વો છે તેની સાથેની સાઠગાંઠ અધર્મ છે. આપણે કિનારા પર ખૂંટીઓ સાથે બંધાયેલી હોડીઓની જેમ જકડાયેલા છીએ. વાસનાની ખૂંટીઓ અને રાગદ્વેષના ખીલાઓએ આપણને બાંધી રાખ્યા છે. આ ખીલાઓ દૂર થાય તો હોડી આગળ વધી શકે. ધર્મ ખોલે છે, મુક્ત કરે છે. બંધનોને કાપે છે.

મહાવીર પ્રભુ રાજમહેલ છોડીને ચાલી નીકળે છે તો એમ નથી માનવાનું કે રાજમહેલમાં કોઇ ખરાબી હતી કે ધન વૈભવમાં કોઇ બુરાઇ હતી, પરંતુ મહાવીર ભગવાને જોયું કે આ ખીલાઓ છે અને જ્યાં સુધી હું ખીલે બંધાયેલો રહીશ ત્યાં સુધી ધર્મના તત્ત્વો સાથે મારો સંબંધ નહીં બંધાય અને ગતિ થઇ શકશે નહીં. મહાવીર ધનને છોડતા નથી પરંતુ ધનને પોતાનાથી છોડાવે છે. ધન છોડવું સહેલું છે પરંતુ ધનથી પોતાને છોડાવવાનું બહુ દુષ્કર છે. ધનને છોડીને ભાગી શકાય છે અને બીજું ધન પકડી લેવાય છે. જેને પણ પકડી લઇએ એ ધન બની જાય છે, કિંમતી ચીજ બની જાય છે. પછી એ રાજમહેલ હોય કે નાની એવી ઝૂંપડી હોય. નાની એવી વસ્તુ પણ માણસને બાંધી રાખે છે. જ્યાં જ્યાં ભવિષ્યની સુરક્ષા અને આશ્ર્વાસન છે ત્યાં તે વસ્તુ ધન બની જાય છે. અગર ભવિષ્ય નથી તો ધનનું કોઇ મૂલ્ય નથી.

ધર્મ, અધર્મ પછી ત્રીજું મૂળ દ્રવ્ય છે આકાશ. બધા પદાર્થોને અવકાશ દેવાનું આકાશનું લક્ષણ છે. આકાશ એટલે અવકાશ દેવાની ક્ષમતા. આકાશ તમામ પદાર્થોને જગ્યા આપે છે. જેને જે તરફ ગતિ કરવી હોય તે કરી શકે છે. જે બનવું હોય તે બની શકે છે. આકાશ કોઇને રોકતું નથી કે કોઇને ધક્કો મારતું નથી. જો કોઇ પદાર્થ ગતિ કરવા માગે તો આકાશ તેને માર્ગ આપે છે. દરેક પદાર્થ સ્વતંત્ર છે. નિરપેક્ષ અસ્તિત્વ છે ચારે બાજુ. આપણે જે કાંઇ કરી રહ્યા છીએ તેને માટે આપણા સિવાય બીજું કોઇ જવાબદાર નથી. આપણને કોઇ રોકતું નથી, કોઇ ટોકતું નથી.

ચોથું દ્રવ્ય છે કાળ-સમય. સમય વહેતો રહે છે. દરેક પદાર્થ સમયાનુસાર પરિવર્તન પામે છે. નવી વસ્તુ જૂની થાય છે. બચપણ, યુવાની, વૃદ્ધાવસ્થા અને મૃત્યુ. આ બધું કાળનું પરિણામ છે. જગતની પ્રવૃત્તિ-નિવૃત્તિમાં જે પાંચ કારણ આપવામાં આવ્યા છે તેમાં કાળ પણ એક કારણ છે. કાળ, સ્વભાવ, નિયતિ, પુરૂષાર્થ અને કર્મ. આ પાંચ કારણોથી કાર્યની ઉત્પત્તિ થાય છે. સમય પણ અવકાશ આપે છે. સમય આપણી પર જોર લગાવતો નથી. સમય પણ તટસ્થ છે તે સારો કે ખરાબ હોતો નથી. આપણે આપણી અનુકૂળતા મુજબ તેને સારો ખરાબ ગણાવીએ છીએ. સમય એ પરિવર્તન છે. તે આપણને સુવિધા આપે છે. આપણે તેનો કેવો ઉપયોગ કરીએ છીએ તે આપણા પર આધારિત છે એમાં સમયનો કોઇ દોષ નથી.

સંસારના સંપૂર્ણ પદાર્થો બે વિભાગમાં વિભક્ત થઇ શકે છે. એક ચેતન અને બીજું જડ. તેના નવ ભેદ છે. જીવ, અજીવ, પુણ્ય, પાપ, આશ્રવ, સંવર, નિર્જરા, બંધ અને મોક્ષ આને નવ તત્ત્વ કહેવામાં આવે છે. આમાં સૌથી પ્રથમ જીવ છે. જીવાત્મા એટલે ચેતના, અનુભવ એ જીવનું લક્ષણ છે. જીવાત્મા, જ્ઞાન, દર્શન, સુખ અને દુ:ખથી ઓળખાય છે. છ દ્રવ્યોમાં અંતિમ તત્ત્વ છે જીવાત્મા.

આકાશનું લક્ષણ છે અવકાશ. કાળનું લક્ષણ છે સમય, ધર્મનું લક્ષણ છે ગતિ, અધર્મનું લક્ષણ છે અગતિ. તેવી જ રીતે જીવનું લક્ષણ છે અનુભવ. જેમ જેમ અનુભવની ક્ષમતા પ્રગાઢ થવા લાગે છે તેમ તેમ મનુષ્ય આત્મા બનવા લાગે છે જેટલી અનુભવની ક્ષમતા ઓછી હોય છે એટલો મનુષ્ય આત્માથી દૂર અને પદાર્થથી નજીક હોય છે. અંતિમ અને શુદ્ધ અનુભવ જ્યારે પ્રાપ્ત થાય છે ત્યારે કશું જાણવાનું બાકી રહેતું નથી. ચેતનાનું લક્ષણ છે અનુભવ. સૂરજ ઊગે છે, પુષ્પો ખીલે છે, ઝરણાઓ ખળખળ વહે છે અને જ્યાં જ્યાં ચેતન્યનો ધબકાર છે તેની સંવેદના મનુષ્ય અનુભવે છે. જડ પદાર્થો પર તેની કોઇ અસર થતી નથી. સુખ દુ:ખ, જ્ઞાન બોધ એ જીવના લક્ષણો છે.

આ છ મૂળ્ય દ્રવ્યો પર વિશ્ર્વ રચાયેલું છે તે અનાદિકાળથી છે. તેનો કોઇ સૃષ્ટા નથી તે અસૃષ્ટ છે તેને કોઇએ બનાવ્યું નથી અને તેને કોઇ મિટાવી શકશે નહીં.